The Clinton email scandal took an even darker and more mysterious turn when emails which were recently turned over revealed all who were included on a series of sensitive email chains.
It appears some of the most sensitive emails were sent to someone known to have direct ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.
The biggest problem as you might suspect, is this put ambassador Stevens and his bodyguards in grave danger, and might even be what led to their eventual deaths
Hillary's senior aide, Huma Abedin, was both the recipient of many of Hillary's emails, as well as the one responsible for forwarding them to other parties.
It would be expected a senior aide might get that kind of access and privilege.
The complicating factor is her extensive ties to The Muslim Brotherhood as well as other Islamic supremacist groups.
Because Abedin was on the email chains, it meant she knew the exact location of Stevens during his time in Benghazi. His movements would have been known, exposing him to a possible attack.
As WND writes:
In one of dozens of emails released last week that included Abedin as among its recipients, on April 24, 2011, Abedin forwarded to Clinton's personal email an internal State Department email from that same day written by Timmy Davis and sent to Abedin as well as to the State Department email addresses of other employees, including Clinton's then-foreign policy aide, Jacob Sullivan.
The email cited a local report stating hotels in Benghazi were being targeted.
The email stated the interim Libyan government "conducted a raid on a house/storage facility and found and arrested an Egyptian cell reportedly there for the purpose of attacking hotels."
Abedin had access to some of the most sensitive information in the world.
Information that in the wrong hands, could definitely prove fatal.
One of the biggest reasons Abedin's involvement in the whole scandal is so suspect is because of her work history and personal relationship with the Clinton's.
Abedin stepped down as Clinton's aid in the early part of 2012 for maternity leave. Only a few short months later she was back, this time in a newly named role carrying the same kind of powers as the one before.
Her work with top secret information and her work in the private sector (as an advisor to Bill Clinton and other powerful Democrats) has cast her in a bad light.
Even the New York Times questioned Abedin's involvement with the Clintons, writing "The picture that emerges from interviews and records suggests a situation where the lines were blurred between Ms. Abedin's work in the high echelons of one of the government's most sensitive executive departments and her role as a Clinton family insider,"
Perhaps the most damning evidence Abedin might be corrupted is her work with several front groups and organizations with pro-Islamic ties.
In fact, her work with the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs for the Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs lasted more than 12 years. This institute had been founded by her late father and is still run by her mother. And it's backed by the Muslim World League, (MWL) which was founded by Muslim Brotherhood.
As WND writes, "In 1993, bin Laden reportedly told an associate that the MWL was one of his three most important charity fronts."
Starting to get the picture?
So the question stands, if one of the world's most powerful leaders has a very prominent and active Pro-Islamic insider in their midst, does it stand to reason that person might have used her position to exploit America.
All the evidence certainly does seem to point in that direction.
Hopefully Americans can add two and two together before 2016 rolls.
80 visits